What's New at the Universal Living Wage Campaign



July 22, 2008

Can Your Group hold the best "National Day of Action"?

We are launching a new competitive initiative among ourselves. The business, nonprofit, union or faith based organization that puts together the "best" National Day of Action will hold the crown of Universal Living Warrior Supreme! For six months the picture that captures that enthusiasm will be featured on the web site until the next National Day of Action when the new champion earns bragging rights. Oklahoma Labor Union 916 is our 1st winner. Congratulations!

Bonus! In these hard times, we need something uplifting among ourselves so from this point forward, we will be awarding a digital camera to the winner of the "best" action or the "most improved" action following each National Day of Action! The first camera is a Cannon Power Shot SD 750 Digital Elph with 7.1 mega pixels, 3.0" LCD, and 3x optical zoom. Sweet! This is really cool camera valued at over $400.00!

We hope to inspire you and help you have fun in these tough times that scream for the Universal Living wage. Everyone calls for affordable housing. Everyone calls for affordable health care. Everyone calls for affordable transportation. The operative word is "affordable". Money makes the world go round. The one, broad-based answer to problems that face workers across America is living wages.

Let's get out there. Let's go to our post offices, get on our bridges, march in our parades and photograph our historical movement that ensures that anyone working 40 hours in a week will be able to afford basic food, clothing, shelter including utilities and access to health care.

Go get 'em! — Richard


June 23, 2008

More Endorsements

We now have over 1,600 organizational endorsers of the Universal Living Wage Campaign in all 50 states, as well as Washington DC, Puerto Rico, Canada and Scotland! We've got at least five groups in every state! Visit our Endorsements page to see those groups who have stood up and made themselves heard for a universal living wage.

Our new Regional Endorsers:

  • Mid America Advocates for the Homeless (Sioux Falls, SD)
  • Just Harvest (Pittsburgh, PA)
  • Social Action Linking Together (Vienna, VA) Renewal
  • Pocono Healthy Communities Alliance (Effort, PA) Renewal
  • Disabled Action Committee (Dale City, VA)
  • Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy (Richmond, VA) Renewal
  • Helping Hand, Inc (Boise, ID) Renewal
  • Childhood Lead Action Project (Providence, RI) Renewal
  • Up State Homeless Coalition (Greenville, SC) Renewal
  • Hunger Action Network (NY, NY) Renewal
  • Fox House (New York, NY)
  • City Life News and Publishing Co. (Phoenix, AZ) Renewal
  • Utah Issues Center for Poverty Research and Action (Salt Lake City, UT)
  • Georgia Coalition to End Homelessness (Atlanta, GA) Renewal
  • Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence (Des Moines, IA) Renewal
  • Southeast Texas Community Development Corp. Inc. (Beaumont, TX) Renewal
  • Southern Appalachian Labor School (Kincaid, WV)
  • Florida Keys Outreach Coalition for the Homeless (Key West, FL)
  • Rumford Group Homes, Inc. (Rumford, ME)
  • Duluth AFL-CIO Central Labor Party (Duluth, MN)

May 2008

Universal Living Wage points of Clarification for NCH

There have been some discussions by some of the members of the National Coalition for the Homeless (NCH) Executive Committee expressing need for a greater understanding of the Universal Living Wage. It is our pleasure to take this opportunity to share some core information about this dynamic formula.

May 2008

Victory: Livable Wages for
Burlington Food Service & Maintenance Workers

After a three and a half year campaign, Burlington school food service and custodial workers of AFSCME Local 1343 won an agreement that will bring all of its members up to a livable wage by the end of the contract. This agreement is a ground-breaking victory. This is the second livable wage victory in less then a year, last fall the Burlington para-educators had the first livable wage victory in the Burlington Schools.
The campaign for livable wages for Burlington food service and custodial workers has not been without struggle. It took three years of educating school board and community members, as well as organizing faith leaders, elected officials, other union members and hundreds of Burlington residents to show their support.
It is hoped that this contract will change the economic reality for many hard working Vermonters. According to the Report on Livable Wages in Burlington Schools put out in June 2007 by the Peace and Justice Center's, Vermont Livable Wage Campaign and the Vermont Workers Center, no food service workers make the hourly livable wage, 43% earned $8.59/hr or less in 2005-2006 school year, and 94% of food service workers are women. Many food service workers have to work two jobs to make ends meet while their own children qualify for free or reduced price meals at school.
Congratulations to the food service and maintenance workers in Burlington and thank you to everyone who help out over the past three and a half years. The hard work of the food service and maintenance workers and AFSCME, coupled with the community solidarity efforts and Burlington Livable City Coalition lead to a victory that is a true community success and finally address some issues of gender wage inequity in Burlington.
See some of the press coverage: Burlington Free Press Article

February 2008

Dear Philip Mangano, Executive Director, US Interagency Council on Homelessness:

The Ten Year Plans coming out of American cities and being promoted by the federal government in an effort to end “chronic” homelessness cannot do so without addressing serious economic concerns of people experiencing homelessness.

Obviously, there are many aspects to homelessness. However, on one level we can divide homelessness into two distinct economic categories: those who work and those who are unable to work. Sustainable responses to these economic categories can be characterized as establishing “Livable Incomes.”

Presently, there are over one million minimum wage workers experiencing homelessness on an annual basis. Although working a full time minimum wage job, a person cannot afford basic rental housing throughout urban America. This is true even with the pending minimum wage of $7.25 per hour by July of 2009. Historically, Congress has embraced the practice of only increasing the minimum wage to a level that takes the American worker less than the economic distance necessary to climb out of poverty. The current minimum wage structure does not elevate the minimum wage worker to a level where they can afford basic housing and the other core necessities of life. Decidedly, the current Congressional approach only ensures their position in the ranks of America’s homeless population. At the same time, while these individuals meet the definition of “chronic” homelessness with four or more instances of homelessness over a three year period, none of America’s 10 year plans provide a solution to this problem.

House the Homeless, Inc. in Austin, Texas conducted a survey in December 2007 of 625 people experiencing homelessness. Astonishingly, 38% indicated that they were currently working, yet still homeless. Upon releasing the survey results (margin of error of 3.98%) we were notified that in Atlanta, Georgia, 45% of their homeless population were working at some point during the week. From Fredericksburg, VA, we learned that 54% were working “at significant jobs.” In Austin, we also posed the question: “Would you work a 40 hour week job if you were sure it would pay you enough for basic food, clothing and shelter [a living wage]?” The resounding affirmative response was that 90.7 % said they would work 40 hours for a living wage. Apparently, the work ethic is there but the wage is not.

Then there is the situation affecting people who cannot work, but who in 2008 will receive a government stipend in the form of Supplemental Security Income, SSI, in the amount of $637.00 throughout the nation. This is about half of the federal minimum wage and again wholly inadequate to sustain independent living without being further heavily subsidized with some kind of government supported “affordable” housing. Securing housing in Washington, DC, Boston, MA or Santa Cruz, CA etc. in the general housing market with an annual salary of less than $14,000 or even half that per year is not possible.

In order to stimulate the economy, specifically the housing industry, and to end “chronic homelessness” for a significant portion of the nation’s homeless community, we must:

1) establish the principle/formula that by using existing government guidelines including the HUD Section 8 formula and the HUD Standard that no one should pay more than 30% of their income on housing, we can ensure that anyone found by the federal government to be disabled will receive a monthly stipend, (SSI), that enables them to afford basic food, clothing, and shelter (including utilities) wherever that person lives throughout the United States.

2) establish the principle/formula that by using existing government guidelines including the HUD Section 8 formula and the HUD Standard that no one should pay more than 30% of their income on housing, we can permanently fix the federal minimum wage and ensure that anyone working 40 hours in a week will be able to afford basic food, clothing, shelter (including utilities) wherever that work is done throughout the United States. See www.UniversalLivingWage.org to read support statistics, the mathematical formula and the hardest asked and answered questions found in our Facts and Myths Section.

By indexing to the local cost of housing, we ensure affordable housing throughout the US. This simple approach mirrors US Military pay practices (Base Housing Allowance).

We strongly encourage the Interagency Council on Homelessness to adopt our resolution and send the United States Congress and the US Department of HUD the clear message that our focus on homelessness: 1) must be for all those experiencing homelessness, not just “chronic” individuals, and 2) we must fix the Supplemental Security Insurance program and the Federal Minimum Wage ensuring that all participants (workers and those unable to work) can afford basic, food, clothing, and shelter (including utilities) throughout the United States.

Sincerely,

Richard R. Troxell
President and Co-Founder, House the Homeless, Inc.
Universal Living Wage National Chairman,
National Coalition for the Homeless
Executive Committee Coordinator, Livable Incomes

Enclosures: please find 1642 endorsing organizations consisting of businesses, non-profits, faith- based organizations, and unions collectively representing over 1,000,000 registered voters.

cc: President George W. Bush, Senator Hillary Clinton, Senator Barack Obama, ICOH-Nat, Reg, TX


January 7, 2008

House the Homeless Smashes Homeless Myth

-- House the Homeless, Inc. & Keep Austin Housed AmeriCorps Survey Report 1/7/08
On December 25, 2007, House the Homeless and Americorps joined forces at the House the Homeless 8th Annual Thermal Underwear Distribution Party and conducted a survey. Invited to participate were over 600 people who were provided life saving thermal underwear and other winter clothing. 526 people experiencing homelessness voluntarily responded to the survey. Note. A total of 19 additional surveys were discarded as being unintelligible.
Survey Results --
Q: Do you work?

yes: 199
no: 327
non-responses: 0
37.8% are working.

Hours of work ranged from 2-3 hours per day to 40+ per week

Q: Do you want to work?

yes; 472
no: 48
6 non-responses
89.7% want to work.

Of those responding, 90.8% want to work.

Q: What is keeping you from working?

Ranked in order of highest importance:

health issues 62
can’t find work 60
disabled 56
no identification 50
economics/ low wages 21
“me” 18
transportation 17
criminal history/legal 16
need tools/clothes 10
lack experience/education 7
retired/age 6
weather 5
day care 4
new to area 4
personal problems 4
time 2
undocumented 2
ethical concerns 1

Note: Several people cited more than one barrier.

Q: Would you work a 40 hour week job if you were sure it would pay you enough for basic food, clothing, and shelter?

yes: 468
no: 48
non-responses: 10
89% would work a 40 hour week for living wages.

Of those responding, 90.7% would work 40 hours for a living wage.

Q: Do you get disability benefits?
yes: 100
no: 426
non-responses: 0
19% receive disability benefits.
Q: Do you have photo ID?

yes: 360
no: 164
non-responses: 2
31.2% need photo identification.

Of those responding, 31.3% need photo ID.

Q: What is keeping you from getting ID?

Ranked in order of highest importance.

1. need ID documents to get photo ID 39
2. costs 38
3. application pending 8
3. no reason “me” 8
3. criminal record 8
4. don’t want to miss work 2
5. hopelessness 1
5. time 1
5. health issue (brain injured) 1

Q: Are you a Veteran?

yes: 121
no: 401
non-responses: 4
23% are Veterans.

Of those responding, 23.2% are Veterans.

Note: 399 signed the survey with either their first name, last name, or both. This was optional.
Note: Statistical significance of the survey:
The Austin Area Homeless Task Force counted 4,000 people experiencing homelessness in the Austin Area in 2007. With 526 homeless people surveyed, 13.1% of the population was sampled.
If the population of people experiencing homelessness is 6,000 then 8.76% of the population was sampled.
Richard R. Troxell, President of House the Homeless, Inc has declared these to be "Stunning results with national implications!" He went on to say that "Although homeless, over 38% of of these people are working at some point during the week. This means that the Puritan Work Ethic is in tact. Furthemore, it is now clear that what is lacking for many of them to end their homelessness is a Living Wage Job."
Mr Troxell is also the National Chairman of the Universal Living Wage Campaign.



November 22, 2007
ONE MORE REASON TO SUPPORT THE UNIVERSAL LIVING WAGE: Income Levels.
"Women living in households with high incomes experienced less violence at the hands of their intimate partners than did women whose households were less financially secure. The results showed a very consistent pattern: As household income to needs goes up, the likelihood of violence goes down."
Found in the report: When Violence Hits Home: How Economics and Neighborhood Play a Role. Produced by the U. S. Department of Justice, John Ashcroft, Atty. General; Deborah J. Daniels Asst. Atty. General; Sarah V. Hart, Director, National Institute of Justice. A brief summary and link to the .pdf is found here.
RESEARCH IN BRIEF NIJ pamphlet: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/205004.pdf.
The National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Abstract and .pdf link has free access.
The Research In Brief is based on the authors' final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, ECONOMIC DISTRESS, COMMUNITY CONTEXT, AND INTIMATE VIOLENCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1988 AND 1994, by Benson, Michael L., and Greer Litton Fox. Purchasing information for the complete document.
Selected bullet points are available electronically from the NIJ Violence Against Women & Family Violence website. This page includes links to other studies on violence against women from the same NIJ site.
"If alcohol is the bomb then economics is the fuse."
Richard R. Troxell on domestic violence


August 22, 2007

2008 Fair Market Rents have been proposed!
See the new Universal Living Wage for your area!

See the vast difference in a universal living wage in our country! You'll find that the cost of housing is not standing still. Can you afford to live in paradise? The cost of a one bedroom apartment in Honolulu, HI has increased $6.75. If you think it's expensive to live in Westchester County, NY, you're correct. It costs $3.35 per hour more to live there than it did a mere 18 months ago. Take a look for yourself!



July 23, 2007

Breaking News About the Minimum Wage Increase!

This is from an article about the increase in the federal minimum wage in the Monday, July23rd 2007 Austin American Statesman. It was written by Jesse J. Holland with the Associated Press.
"Fast-food waitress Fawn Townsend of Raleigh, NC knows exactly what she is going to do if her salary goes up with Tuesday's increase in the federal minimum wage: start saving for a car so she can find a second job to make ends meet.

"Being a single person, you can't pay all your bills with one minimum wage job," said Townsend, 24.
And from a business perspective, 'A PNC Economic Outlook survey done in April 2007 showed that three out of four small-end-market business owners said that raising the minimum wage would have little or no impact on their business.'"
Another article on the rate increase by Holland can be found here.


July 23, 2007

Federal Government Pays its Employees Locality Pay

Ever heard of Federal Locality Pay? “In 1990, the office of personnel Management implemented the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act (FEPCA) which was designed to enable the government to recruit, motivate, and retain a qualified representative work force.”
In addition to an employee’s base pay, the federal government can offer monetary recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives.
In 1994, the federal government implemented a Locality Pay system for General Schedule (GS) employees. Pay rates are adjusted on a locality basis as opposed to a national basis.
This should remind us of the U.S. Military that has moved from the VAH pay system to the Base Housing Allowance, BAH, system. Here the U.S. Military, in addition to paying personnel based on pay grade and time-in-grade, also provides pay adjustments based on geographic cost considerations. For example: if a military family gets transferred from Fort Hood, Texas to Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington, D.C., they receive a pay increase to reflect the cost of living difference.
So we see that the U.S. Military and the Federal Government, both pay their employees using geographical considerations. No doubt, it is time for the American people be given the same consideration. We need to index the federal minimum wage to the local cost of housing so that no matter where a minimum wage worker works, they will be able to afford basic food, clothing, shelter, and have access to health care. It is time for the Universal Living Wage.



July 22, 2007

Economist David Alexander On What Happens
When People Earn Above a Minimum Wage

"In all of my years as an Economist and a Business Specialist, (you may have used the word educator,) in virtually every place in the world, from small towns and large cities in the United States, to communities and countries in Africa and Asia; Any where you go it is a virtually a universally consistent fact, that where the average person has access to the means to earn a living which is above the poverty level; That meaning enough to not just survive, but actually having the ability to put away something to work with over time, be it for education, or business or some other personal development, - In those places, you see that there is a vast reduction in social-ills including drug-abuse, most types of crime, lack of education and other problems. You can see that these things exist for people, or are alleviated directly based on people's access to participation in their economy and how much chance people have to economically improve themselves."
Dr. David Alexander, Professor of Management; Director, Department of Business, San Angelo University
Dr. Alexander earned his BA at the University of Texas at Austin, his MBA at Southern Methodist University, and his PhD at the University of Oklahoma.



February 22, 2007

"Ten Myths About Homelessness" video
now available at CAN Homeless Task Force website

See ten big myths about homelessness spelled out from nationwide data collected by homeless avocacy groups. Send the link to your friends! It's time that everyone understood that millions of families are only one crisis away from homelessness.
Thanks to the Austin/Travis County Health and Human Services Department for their help in creating this video, and to producer Yooyung Lee, graduate student at the UT School of Journalism.

February 20, 2007

Minimum Wage Increase Is Good for Business

By Chuck Collins, TomPaine.com. Posted January 29, 2007.

"People who tell you that raising the minimum wage will hurt small business are flat out full of it," said Lew Prince, co-owner of Vintage Vinyl, a music retail business in St. Louis. "Small business owners know that keeping workers is easier and cheaper than finding and training new ones."

http://www.alternet.org/story/47375/




January 25, 2007

ULW Book LOOKING UP AT THE BOTTOM LINE
Mailed to Each Senate and House Member

Here's a sample of the letter sent to your Senators and Representatives:
January 12, 2007
Dear Congressman Doggett,
Henry Ford recognized the value of a loyal, stable work force. When his efforts to launch his assembly line concept floundered, he took the radical approach of almost doubling wages. He found that:
  1. unscheduled absenteeism dropped to almost zero overnight
  2. there was almost complete stoppage of internal theft
  3. there was significant reduction of employee turnover
  4. there was significant reduction in retraining costs
  5. his employees then became his own customers, creating a positive economic feedback mechanism for his own business.
According to the National Coalition for the Homeless, 3.5 million people will experience homelessness in the nation this year. They will come from the minimum wage pool of 10.1 million people.
The federal government has declared that 42% of people experiencing homelessness are working at some point during the week. And yet, the last several US Conference of Mayors reports have stated that no one working at the minimum wage can afford a one bedroom apartment in any major city in the US. This will not change with a minimum wage increase of $2.10 over two years. In fact, inflation will likely consume this increase by the time if fully takes effect. More overly, not one minimum wage worker will get off the streets of Austin or any city in the US. There is no doubt that raising the minimum wage will help low wage workers, but if means that we don’t address this wage disparity for several more years and then only to move to a point that falls short of the goal of workers housing themselves, then the increase and general approach are wholly inadequate.
I have enclosed an unpolished version of the book LOOKING UP AT THE BOTTOM LINE. Here we take a fresh approach to the Federal Minimum Wage (FMW). I index the FMW to the local cost of housing throughout the US. I have created a formula using existing guidelines that bases the FMW on the moral premise that anyone working 40 hours in a week will be able to afford basic rental housing, eat, and be clothed, wherever that work is done throughout the nation. I have also devised a 10 year plan for its gradual enactment.
Please consider this approach that: reflects current US military pay practices (Base Housing Allowance, BAH), has been proven to stabilize and bolster business by dramatically reducing retraining costs, and the enactment of which will conservatively end homelessness for over 1 million minimum wage workers and prevent economic homelessness for all 10.1 million minimum wage workers.
The Universal Living Wage campaign is requesting that you carry this legislation and champion this cause. With over 1,000,000 registered voters now supporting this initiative, we can provide you with the grass roots political backing necessary to advance this moral issue. Thank you.
Richard R. Troxell, National Chairman ULW Campaign
Executive Board Member, National Coalition for the Homeless
President, House the Homeless



September 19, 2006

Living Wage Laws & Communities:
Smarter Economic Development, Lower Than Expected Costs

—by Andrew J. Elmore (Economic Justice Project November, 2003)
The Brennan Center’s Economic Justice Project helps working people, lawmakers and reform coalitions in cities across the country design and implement living wage policies tailored to local needs. We provide assistance with (1) policy design, (2) economic impact analysis, (3) legislative drafting, and (4) legal analysis and defense.
A new report by the Center, Living Wage Laws and Communities: Smarter Economic Development, Lower Than Expected Costs, details that these laws have improved economic development in their communities and have cost much less to implement than most analysts initially expected.
This is the first study of its kind to interview administrators at a wide range of local governments that have actually implemented a living wage law and have had the time to assess the actual costs to their cities or counties. Major findings for those cities where a living wage law was adopted include:

Increased contract costs by less than 0.1% of the overall local budget.
Competitive bidding instituted for contracts.
Increased public support for their economic development programs.

For the Executive Summary, Follow this link:

http://www.brennancenter.org/programs/living_wage/elmore_summary.pdf

For the full report, Follow this link:

http://www.brennancenter.org/programs/living_wage/elmore_report.pdf


August 3, 2006

Minimum wage double-cross in Congress

by Yonce Shelton, senior policy director of Sojourners/Call to Renewal.
" ... my chosen shall long enjoy the work of their hands. They shall not labor in vain" (Isaiah 65:22-23).
Work must "work" for families, and increasing the minimum wage can help. How society treats its workers says much about our values and priorities. The federal minimum wage was last increased, to $5.15, in 1997. Since then its purchasing power has dropped 20 percent and is now at its lowest level since 1955.
This year, Senate Democrats vowed not to allow a vote on raising their own pay until they are allowed to vote on raising the minimum wage. Fifty-eight House Republicans asked their leadership for a vote before the August congressional recess. In late July, 30 House Republicans said they would join Democrats in preventing the House from recessing until there was a vote.
These efforts paid off. Sort of.
Last Friday, the House passed legislation to raise the minimum wage to $7.25 per hour over three years. But there's a catch. The bill (Estate Tax and Extension of Tax Relief Act - aka "trifecta" bill) would also permanently reduce the estate tax - an important source of federal revenue impacting only the wealthiest half of one percent of our nation's taxpayers, which also encourages billions in charitable donations (according to the Congressional Budget Office, between $13-25 billion in 2000). The bill would also extend other expiring tax cuts.
In essence, House leadership decided it was fine to help an estimated 14.9 million workers making less than $7.25 per hour increase their average annual income by $1,200 to $4,400, as long as 8,200 wealthy people receive an average estate tax reduction of $1.4 million (in 2011). Minimum wage workers earning as low as $10,700 per year are given a raise, but only if a few individuals with estates worth more than $3.5 million benefit as well.
Many elected officials worry about the impact on small businesses of increasing wages. However, one study failed to find any systematic, significant job loss associated with the 1997 minimum wage increase. Further, states with higher minimum wages have outdone those with lower wages in their levels of employment, including for jobs in retail and small businesses. Similarly, many fear dire consequences for family farms of keeping the estate tax in place. But the American Farm Bureau has not referred publicly to any examples of farms being sold to pay estate taxes, according to a recent New York Times article.
Many elected officials worry about the impact on small businesses of increasing wages. However, one study failed to find any systematic, significant job loss associated with the 1997 minimum wage increase. Further, states with higher minimum wages have outdone those with lower wages in their levels of employment, including for jobs in retail and small businesses. Similarly, many fear dire consequences for family farms of keeping the estate tax in place. But the American Farm Bureau has not referred publicly to any examples of farms being sold to pay estate taxes, according to a recent New York Times article.
Businesses will not be harmed as many claim. But the "trifecta" bill is likely to harm low-income workers, despite the wage increase. The estate tax provision, when fully in phased in (2012), will cost the Treasury $753 billion over 10 years. With $753 billion we could fund ALL social programs covered by the annual health and human services budget. Without tax revenue to provide for social and community needs - highways, education, emergency responses - it's easier for Congress to claim spending is out of control and justify eliminating investments in the common good. It's happened before.
Think back to last year's budget process. Proclaiming fiscal restraint, political leaders cut $40 billion in social services (health care, child support, educational assistance) for the less fortunate. In reality, those cuts made room for $70 billion in tax cuts. Simple math tells us the result was actually an increase in the deficit (by $30 billion) AND more tax cuts heavily favoring the wealthy at the expense of basic supports for the poor. The bill passed in the House last week will have a similar effect.
We will soon mark the anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, when poverty briefly topped the national agenda and the importance of community support and investment for the common good was illustrated. When Katrina hit, the Senate was intent on repealing the estate tax but had to drop that effort. Even President Bush eventually reversed course and reinstated wage protections for Gulf construction workers that he had removed in September 2005. That we are back to fighting an estate tax rollback that is 75 percent of the cost of full repeal, and having to fight gimmicks disrespecting hourly wage earners, says much about our political leaders' priorities.
The House leadership proudly touted its "American Values Agenda" week in July, which included votes on gay marriage, the pledge of allegiance, abortion, and human cloning. Missing from that agenda was the value of promoting family economic security. Integrity of political procedure seems also to have been missing, which isn't new. Before last week's vote, a $7.25 minimum wage increase passed a House committee as part of an appropriations bill. Apparently that committee's values took House leaders by surprise. Stuck without an easy way to strip out the wage increase, House leadership has chosen not to move that appropriations bill forward until after the elections. By denying a straightforward vote and coupling the wage increase with other politically dicey provisions, House leaders are again choosing political charades over people and the common good.
If the "trifecta" bill becomes law (the Senate will vote on it this week), the trade-off for a minimum wage increase will be a sacrifice of other supports for working families playing by the rules but coming up short. Work must "work" - working families, individuals, and those unable to work deserve a living family income. They deserve to be treated with respect - especially by their elected representatives. They deserve an up or down vote on the wages for their labor.

Santa Fe sets highest minimum wage
Detractors claim $9.50 an hour will ruin businesses

By ELECTA DRAPER, The Denver Post
The movement by cities and states to increase their minimum wages beyond the stagnant federal level of $5.15 an hour has a new epicenter.
Santa Fe's minimum hourly wage, set at $8.50 in June 2004 and bumped to $9.50 on Jan. 1, is the highest in the country. And there are plans to raise it to $10.50 in 2008. "Living wage" advocates deem it economic justice while many business backers call it economic suicide for this tourist-dependent city of about 66,000 residents.
Supporters say the increased wage has allowed workers to better afford the essentials of life and has enabled some to quit working two or three jobs. But detractors say the law has simply priced low-skilled workers out of the market while harshly punishing many small businesses with alrea in the pockets of some 9,000 workers."
Some people, holding down two or three jobs to make ends meet, have found they can get by with one, she says.
"More working people have time to spend with their children ? to make them breakfast or help them with their homework. It shows what a community dedicated to economic justice can really do. It's honoring the dignity of workers," she says.
But Rob Day, owner of the Santa Fe Bar and Grill and a member of a group that unsuccessfully sued to stop the ordinance, says the hike is big enough to ruin many enterprises.
"I'm a Democrat, but I can tell you that all of us in the service industries were flabbergasted that they didn't just want to elevate the minimum wage, they wanted to take it to $8.50 and then $9.50 an hour," Day says.

July 5, 2006

Homelessness a Threat for Iraq Vets

Herold Noel had nowhere to call home after returning from military service in Iraq. He slept in his Jeep, taking care to find a parking space where he wouldn't get a ticket.

"Then the nightmares would start," says the 26-year-old former Army private first class, who drove a fuel truck in Iraq. "I saw a baby decapitated when it was run over by a truck. I relived that every night."

Across America on any given evening, hundreds of veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan like Noel are homeless, according to government estimates. The reasons for their plight are many. For some, residual stress from daily insurgent attacks and roadside bombs makes it tough to adjust to civilian life; some can't navigate government assistance programs; others simply can't afford a house or apartment.

They are living on the edge in towns and cities big and small, from Washington state to California and Florida. Some of the hardest hit are in New York City, where housing costs "can be very tough," says Peter Dougherty, head of the federal government's Homeless Veterans Program. Studio apartments routinely exceed $1,000 a month no small sum for veterans trying to land on their feet.

As a member of the National Guard, Nadine Beckford patrolled New York train stations after the Sept. 11 attacks, then served a treacherous year in the Gulf region.

But when she returned home from Iraq, she found her storage locker had been emptied of all of her belongings and her bank account had been depleted. She believes her boyfriend took everything and "just vanished."

Six months after her return to America, she lives in a homeless shelter in Brooklyn, sharing a room with eight other women and attending a job training program. Her parents live in Jamaica and are barely making ends meet, she says. "I'm just an ordinary person who served. I'm not embarrassed about my homelessness, because the circumstances that created it were not my fault," says Beckford, 30, who was a military-supply specialist at a U.S. base in Iraq a sitting duck for around-the-clock attacks "where hell was your home."

It was a "hell" familiar to Noel during his eight months in Iraq. But it didn't stop when he returned home to New York last year and couldn't find a job to support his wife and three children. Without enough money to rent an apartment, he turned to the housing programs for vets, "but they were overbooked," Noel says.

While he was in Iraq, his family had lived in military housing in Georgia. In New York, they ended up in a Bronx shelter "with people who were just out of prison, and with roaches," Noel says. "I'm a young black man from the ghetto, but this was culture shock. This is not what I fought for, what I almost died for. This is not what I was supposed to come home to."

There are about 200,000 homeless vets in the United States, according to government figures. About 10 percent are from either the 1991 Gulf War or the current one, about 40 percent are Vietnam veterans, and most of the others served when the country was not officially at war.

"In recent years, we've tried to reach out sooner to new veterans who are having problems with post-traumatic stress, depression or substance abuse, after seeing combat," says Dougherty. "These are the veterans who most often end up homeless." About 350 nonprofit service organizations are working with the Department of Veterans Affairs to help veterans.

But the veterans still land on a hard bottom line: Almost half of America's 2.7 million disabled veterans receive $337 or less a month in benefits, according to the government. Fewer than one-tenth are rated 100 percent disabled, meaning they get $2,393 a month, tax free.

"And only those who receive that 100 percent benefit rating can survive in New York," says J.B. White, a 36-year-old former Marine who served with a National Guard unit in Iraq. His colon was removed after he was diagnosed with severe ulcerative colitis, which civilian medical experts believe started in Iraq under the stress of war.

"I'd be homeless if it weren't for the support of my family," says White, who is trying to win benefits from the VA. He also helps others, like Beckford, as head of a Manhattan-based social service agency that finds non-government housing for vets.

Noel now attends a program to get work in studio sound production. He was the protagonist of the documentary film "When I Came Home," which was named best New York-made documentary at the Tribeca Film Festival this year. Just after the news reports about his plight, he learned the government was granting him the 100 percent disability compensation he sought after being turned down.

Noel doesn't blame the Army, which "helped make my dreams come true," he says, recalling the military base life in Georgia and in Korea that his family enjoyed before his deployment to Iraq. "I had a house, a car they gave me everything they promised me," he says. "Now it's up to the government and the people we're defending to take care of their soldiers."

(From AP Wire)


May 17, 2006

Immigration, Minimum Wage, and Homelessness

Immigrant workers are pouring across our southern border but not our northern border. This is because the economy to the North is relative to ours. Whereas, people streaming across the southern border are willing to leave their homeland, to sleep eight people in a room, leave their homes for as long as eight years, and send 85% of the wage they earn back home to la familia.
When the immigration demonstrations began here in early April, every flag we saw was Mexican. Hearing the anxiety that this caused for North Americans, the flags were quickly exchanged for the stars and stripes. But the sentiment was clear; the homeland is Mexico. All surveys show that the vast majority of migrant workers intend to come here for a short period of time, earn as much money as possible and return home to their families as quickly as possible. But as the years roll by, workers become desperate to be with their families, so they send for them at great expense, personal risk and even death.
President Bush says that the undocumented workers come to do the work that workers in the United States don't want and won't do. That is true. Workers don't want those backbreaking jobs at the wage that is being offered. That is because according to several US Conference of Mayors Reports, it is a wage that won't afford a full time, minimum wage worker the ability to rent a basic apartment anywhere in the US. So what is the incentive to work a full time, 40 hour a week job if it still leaves a person homeless and unable to afford basic housing? According to the National Coalition for the Homeless, 3.5 million people will face homelessness this year. The government says that 42% of these people are still working at some point during the week. Obviously, the work ethic is there, but the wage is not. These workers come from the pool of 10,000,000 minimum wage workers and the pool of 12,000,000 immigrant workers. This is a significant portion of our core workforce doing work that can't be out sourced.
That federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour. Imagine working 40 hours a week for 50 weeks, earning only $10,700, and still not being able to afford basic rental housing. As Oprah Winfrey observed recently, you can't just raise the minimum wage one or two dollars and expect it to make any difference. Six or seven dollars an hour still won't house anyone in our most expensive cities. And to raise it anymore than that would destroy small businesses in rural America. We can't have that. So what do we do?
We have come up with a pragmatic solution. We fix the federal minimum wage. Using existing government guidelines, we have created a formula that links the wage to the local cost of housing and ensures that anyone working a forty hour week will be able to afford basic rental housing wherever that work is done throughout the United States. We believe, that upon passage, this can end homelessness for at least 1,000,000 minimum wage workers, stabilize small business by reducing their employee turn over and reduce the subsequent retraining costs almost to zero. But won't this encourage more immigrants to seek the golden wage ring of the United States? Perhaps. But what we have learned is ... it is not our culture that draws these workers; it is our dollars. Once we embrace the moral tenant that a wage must afford a minimum wage worker basic rental housing, other countries will follow suite. They will set their own standards. And when they do, when people can afford the basics of food, clothing, shelter, and have access to health care, they will remain at home with la familia.
Richard R. Troxell, National Chairman
Universal Living Wage

March 9, 2006

Putting A Face on Poverty

The Travis County Commissioner's Court declared January, 2006 as Poverty Awareness Month. Locally, Poverty Awareness Month activities were coordinated by the Community Action Network and the Basic Needs Coalition of Central Texas, a collaboration of over 25 social service providers who strive every day to help our neighbors move from poverty to self sufficiency. These groups sent out a "facts sheet" highlighting data on poverty in Travis county. The sheet explores some root causes of poverty and gives ways community members can be part of the solution. Test your knowledge against this informative document!

March 4, 2006

Richard Troxell named Homeless Advocate of the Year

Richard was being modest, but the ULW staff decided we should mention that last October the Texas Homeless Network named Richard R. Troxell their 2005 "Homeless Advocate of the Year". This award was for the House the Homeless Initiative: The Universal Living Wage Campaign.

Congratulations, Richard, and thank you for all your hard work!


February 21, 2006

New GOP Fed Chair Tells
the Truth About the Minimum Wage

Conservatives have long claimed that having a minimum wage supposedly reduces employment. They argue this even though statistics have long shown that's simply not true. And this week, under intense questioning, new Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke appears to have admitted that conservatives are not telling the truth.
That's right, in his testimony to the House Financial Services Committee, Bernanke had an exchange with Independent Congressman Bernie Sanders (VT) where he admitted as much. Here's the exchange:
SANDERS: Chairman Bernanke, should the Congress raise the minimum wage so that every worker in America who works 40 hours a week escapes from poverty? A very simple question, sir.
BERNANKE: I'm going to be an economist and give you the one hand, the other hand. On the minimum wage, it's actually a very controversial issue among economists. Clearly, if you raise the minimum wage, then those workers who retain their jobs will get higher income and therefore it helps them. The concerns that some economists have raised about the minimum wage are first, is it as well targeted as it could be? That is, how much of the increase is going to the teenage children of suburban families, for example? And secondly, does it have any employment effects? That is, do higher wages lower employment of low-wage workers?
SANDERS: And your response is?
BERNANKE: My response is that I think it doesn't lower employment.
So there we have it folks - a conservative Republican Federal Reserve Chairman, nominated by a conservative Republican president, acknowledges that the right-wing's rhetoric about minimum wage just isn't true. Enough said.
(This conversation comes from the transcript from Congressional Quarterly on Lexis-Nexis - widely relied on as the official transcript of such hearings. The transcript is from CQ Transcriptions from the House Financial Services Committee hearing on February 15th, 2006.

January 11, 2006

EVERYONE Deserves a Living Wage

Here's a message from National Coalition for the Homeless:
ULW Members MLK Day 2005

This Sunday, had Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. lived, he would celebrate his 77th birthday. If he were here today he would no doubt be asking YOU – as a person of faith and conscience – to stand with him in a cause for which he was passionate – a living wage for all workers.

From his 1963 “I have a dream” speech to his final act of supporting striking workers in Memphis, TN, King's call for a living wage was more than an economic issue – it was and is a matter of human rights. Since King’s death in 1968, the news has not been good.
For more than EIGHT YEARS the federal minimum wage of $5.15 has not been increased. Since that time, inflation has eroded its value by more than 15 percent. Consequently, to have the purchasing power it had in 1968, the minimum wage would have to be $9.05 per hour today - an increase of $3.90. Minimum wage employees working full time, year round earn only $10,700 a year - $5,000 below the official poverty line for a family of three. In contrast, in the eight years since Congress last raised the minimum wage, your elected officials have raised their own salaries seven times.
You and your faith community now have an opportunity to right this injustice. We are asking you to engage your faith community in the ongoing march for a just living wage. Our sister organization, “Let Justice Roll” has launched its Living Wage Campaign. We need you help organize a prayerful and meaningful event in your faith community that enables you and those in your circle of concern to help move local, state, and federal government officials toward a just, compassionate, and appropriate living wage. Centered around this weekend's remembrance of King's birthday, the folks at Let Justice Roll have provided everything you need to make it happen! The Program is called:
LIVING WAGE DAYS
To learn more, go HERE and help all American workers obtain a LIVING WAGE!
(link: http://www.letjusticeroll.org)
Notice that there are a variety of downloadable materials for study and action. So many will benefit by your commitment to pass legislation at every level to raise the minimum wage. Let's stand together - people of every faith - in calling for a new day for America's workers. You can help make happen, and it can begin right here, right now!
Blessings to you as ever,
Vince Isner and your FaithfulAmerica.org Team
"Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an overflowing stream." Amos 5:24

SOME HISTORY...

December 24, 2005

Rent shuts many out:
Low-income families are losing ground, study says

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press
"WASHINGTON - The cost of rental housing has increased faster than wages, making it increasingly difficult for low-income families to afford even modest apartments, an advocacy group said this month.
"The picture is similar to past years, but it's getting worse," said Danilo Pelletiere, research director of the National Low Income Housing Coalition.
The coalition, which advocates for more affordable housing, issues a report each year tracking rental costs in every state, county and metropolitan area in the country.
It says families should spend no more than 30 percent of their incomes on housing and utilities, a standard recognized by many housing experts. Under that standard, the coalition said it could not find a single county in the United States where a full-time worker making minimum wage could afford a one-bedroom apartment."
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/3546300.html

November 26, 2005

Rent Snafus Plague Hurricane Evacuees

Richard R. Troxell, the Chaiman of the Universal Living Wage, says this issue is "a nightmare about to happen."

Here's the latest report from the AP Wire:
Only $114 a month stands between Shawn Williams, a Hurricane Katrina evacuee, and eviction from her temporary apartment in suburban Houston. Williams can afford to pay out of her own pocket and is willing to do so to make up the difference between the $633 voucher she gets in federal housing aid and the apartment's $747 rent. But a bureaucratic snag prevents her from closing the gap on her own.
Now, after paying the entire rent herself for months because the landlord cannot accept the voucher, Williams says she is running out of money and fears losing the two-bedroom apartment where she has lived with her disabled husband and teenage son since fleeing New Orleans more than two months ago.
The government's disaster relief agency says help is on the way for Williams and other evacuees caught in the frustrating tangle that prevents landlords from accepting more rent money than what Washington is willing to cover.
It is a problem in Houston and elsewhere where rents set by the market outpace the government's gauge for determining aid levels. For families, it is making it harder to find long-term housing. For cash-strapped cities, it is adding to their financial woes and depleting their resources for helping hurricane victims.

"These vouchers are pretty much worthless because they don't cover the full amount of the rent," Williams, 40, said in a telephone interview from the Tranquility Bay apartment complex in Pearland, Texas.

Federal officials said they could not say how many Katrina victims have been affected. Houston officials said as many as 6,000 additional rental units could be opened to families using federal vouchers if they were allowed to pay part of the rent.
Since Katrina hit on Aug. 29, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has provided $3.4 billion in housing assistance to evacuated victims. The money goes directly to victims or to state and local governments as reimbursement for their costs in housing hundreds of thousands of evacuees.

Housing officials say FEMA reimburses only as much as a federal measure of average rental costs, which differs by city. In some cases, local officials are unwilling to accept extra payments from tenants for fear that FEMA will not pick up its share.

The agency now is allowing some flexibility for reimbursements, including increasing the level of local rental costs and letting evacuees contribute to rental payments, spokeswoman Nicol Andrews said.

Last month, FEMA circulated an internal e-mail clarifying the policy; it is not clear whether the information went to local housing officials.

The agency is preparing a statement to assure Houston housing officials, and FEMA's acting director, R. David Paulison, has told the city that FEMA will "pay a fair price, but would not be gouged," Andrews said.

The city is awaiting official word. Until then, Houston will not pay the rent for people in apartments that cost more than FEMA will subsidize, said John Walsh, deputy chief of staff to Houston Mayor Bill White.

Houston has issued vouchers for long-term housing to about 18,000 of an estimated 40,000 families who will need it by the year's end, but the city anticipates that another 14,000 evacuees soon will move out of hotels.
Houston has received $37.2 million from FEMA to repay initial housing costs for evacuees, and it expects to get an additional $101 million for expenses through Jan. 31. Even so, Walsh fears the city will not be reimbursed for payments above the voucher levels. "Until we get a written confirmation, we're not going to expose ourselves," he said.
In Atlanta, FEMA provided $5.7 million in housing aid for hurricane evacuees, said Sandra Allen Walker, deputy chief of staff to Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin. The city contributed an additional $400,000, Walker said, but that still does not cover the total expenses.

"What we are seeking is for the federal government to pick up the gap," Walker said. "The amount that they offer is not commensurate with the market rate for living in Atlanta."

In Baton Rouge, La., dozens of people are on a waiting list for housing where they can pay part of the cost, said Robert McNeese, the city's director of community development.

"What we are seeking is for the federal government to pick up the gap," Walker said. "The amount that they offer is not commensurate with the market rate for living in Atlanta.

In Baton Rouge, La., dozens of people are on a waiting list for housing where they can pay part of the cost, said Robert McNeese, the city's director of community development.
"There are not any apartments that fall under fair market rents anymore, so the clients have to make up the difference," McNeese said.
Compounding the problem is FEMA's Dec. 1 deadline to move all evacuees out of hotels and into apartments or other long-term housing. Housing advocates estimate that more than 157,000 evacuees still are in hotel rooms in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma alone.
In Los Angeles, at least 96 percent of the metropolitan area's estimated 2 million rental units are full, and advocates are scrambling to find homes for at least 4,000 evacuees asking for help.
As of last week, evacuees were living in about 600 hotel rooms, said Tara Bannister, executive director of the California Apartment Association. She said FEMA's cap on rental assistance in Los Angeles was "far below" what units cost.
Moreover, "if a unit were going that cheap to begin with, it's usually already full," she said.
The problem is particularly prevalent in Texas, where landlords are beginning the eviction process against evacuees, some of whom have been unable to pay rent for the past two months.
"I have a lot of residents who are very angry with me," said Kirk Tate of Orion Real Estate Services in Houston, who manages about 16,000 apartment units in Texas. "But we may wake up six, seven months down the road and we would still have this."
On the Net: Federal Emergency Management Agency: http://www.fema.gov/

October 5, 2005

Confront Poverty!

After Katrina, we listened dazed but still hopeful as President Bush gave his, “We Will Rebuild It (New Orleans) speech. Never before has this nation been exposed so blatantly to our own poverty. In response, the President declared that “We have a duty to confront poverty.” These are courageous words. He spoke of creating enterprise zones which will give tax incentives to business to rebuild these devastated areas. This is good. But now the President has suspended the Davis-Bacon Act which requires federal contractors to pay workers the average or “prevailing” regional wages for public construction projects. In New Orleans, that wage is just over $9 an hour. The act’s suspension allows contractors to pay as little as $5.15 an hour, the current federal minimum wage.
But just providing incentives for business to return and rebuild New Orleans and paying minimum wages does not “confront poverty." The jobs must be put in the hands of local workers. But to just create jobs and put to them in the hands of local workers without ensuring that they are living wage jobs, clearly does not “confront poverty.”
It has been reported that over 1,000,000 people were made homeless from Katrina. According to the National Coalition for the Homeless, this year 3.5 million other people will experience homelessness throughout the United States. According to the last several US Conference of Mayors Reports, no minimum wage worker can get into and keep basic rental housing in this country. At the same time, the US government has stated that 42% of people experiencing homelessness are working at some point during the week. So clearly, the work ethic is there…but the wage is not.
How do we confront poverty if we rebuild an entire city and put back into place a permanent underclass of impoverished minimum wage workers? We don’t. In 1938, in response to the Great Depression, both halves of Congress created the federal minimum wage. The idea was to ensure that a full time worker could afford the basics- food, clothing, and shelter. At $5.15 per hour or about $10,000 per year, this is no longer possible. However, by taking a page out of our military pay practices, and indexing the wage to the local cost of housing throughout the US, we can encourage people to work. By basing the wage on the morale premise that anyone working a 40 hour week, which affords basic rental housing, we do encourage people to work and we do confront poverty. Additionally, we draw these folks away from needing to be on the “dole” and their endless reliance on tax payers.
By reestablishing people’s ability to achieve self-sufficiency through work, we re-instill people with a sense of core American values evidenced in the platitudes. “A fair wage for a fair days work,” which creates the ability for any worker to “chase the American Dream” by “pulling oneself up by one’s own boot straps.”
Red and Blue states alike, we are ready to defend these ideas. We are ready to rebuild New Orleans and all of America. Yes, let’s do confront poverty. Let’s encourage people to work at jobs that they know will afford them basic life necessities. Let’s give them a sense of pride and belief in America, knowing that if they work a 40 hour week then their wage will put a roof over their heads other than a bridge.
Richard R. Troxell
National Chairman, Universal Living Wage

September 30, 2005

Minimum Wage Law Takes Effect in Santa Fe, NM

Here's an article you may have missed in The New Mexican. Here's a sample of this story.
"Santa Fe’s minimum-wage ordinance went into effect Thursday after state district Judge Daniel Sanchez threw out a court challenge.
That means businesses inside city limits with 25 or more employees must pay all workers at least $8.50 an hour — making Santa Fe the only place in New Mexico where the state and federal minimum of $5.15 an hour no longer applies."
Although this is fantastic news for workers in Santa Fe, things are heating up elsewhere. Nine (9) states have now passed laws that make it illegal to pass minimum wage laws to pay wages higher than the Federal minimum Wage. As you can see, we still need to pass the Universal Living Wage.

September 5, 2005

Did You Miss SELLING WOMEN SHORT: THE LANDMARK BATTLE FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS AT WAL-MART?

Don't be fooled by the name of the class action suit Betty Dukes v. Wal-Mart. This affects not only women, but all employees, shoppers and taxpayers. From the book: "each Wal-Mart store employing 200 people costs taxpayers $420,750 per year in public assistance." Basic Books publishes Liza Featherstone's book, and it is now available in paperback!

June 15, 2005

Illegal Immigrants will take those minimum wage jobs...

...even if it means sleeping eight to a one-bedroom apartment.
Mexican President Vicente Fox stated that Mexican immigrants take jobs that “not even blacks will take.” The Austin American Statesman describes this as having “stuck his foot in his mouth.” President Bush recently defended his proposed immigrant workers program when he said that these immigrants are filling minimum wage jobs that Americans don’t want and won’t fill.
According to the last several U.S. Conference of Mayor reports, a full time minimum wage North American worker cannot afford a one bedroom apartment in any major urban area in America. So why would any intelligent North American worker work a full time job at the Federal minimum wage of $5.15 per hour? On the other hand, we have worker immigrants from Mexico and Central America flooding access our borders seeking “good wage” jobs. They will press themselves and 6 or 7 fellow workers into a one bedroom apartment for up to eight years and send 85% of their earnings back home to “La Familia.” Who can blame them? To them these are good wages.
The U.S. needs to fix the Federal Minimum Wage by indexing it to the local cost of housing throughout the United States. Minimum wage jobs are support/service jobs and can’t be out-sourced. Retail clerks, laborers, dry cleaners, cafeteria workers, all wish to afford basic rental housing having worked a 40 hour a week job. If we are to shore up the very base of our socio-economic system, then we need to ensure that a full time minimum wage worker can afford basic food, clothing, shelter, and access to emergency health care. We then need to encourage other countries to adopt similar economic policies. This dual approach, would allow North Americans to feel they can accept these jobs and enable all others to remain at home.
---Richard R. Troxell
www.UniversalLivingWage.org

June 4, 2005

ULW Founder is honored by NCH appointment

Richard Troxell has just returned from Washington, DC where he was elected to the Executive Committee of the National Coalition For the Homeless. He was also tapped to Co-Chair NCH's Policy Committee.
NCH is our nation's oldest grassroots homeless advocacy organization. Richard's involvement with the National Coalition for the Homeless began when he was chosen to receive the Beverly "Ma" Curtis Award for homeless activism in 1997.

May 21, 2005

A New Endorsement Category is Born!

The Universal Living Wage Campaign welcomes its first Celebrity endorser, singer and songwriter Sara Hickman. A longtime champion of rights for the homeless, Sara is a welcome addition to our numbers.

May 12, 2005

Richard Troxell Back on the Road!

Richard travels to Pasadena, CA and on May 20th he will be the lunch time keynote speaker at the Springfield College Conference to End Poverty. The Topic: The Universal Living Wage. Go to the National Organization for Human Services web site at http://www.nohse.com/ to see details.

SAVE the DATE: Septemper 6th will be the first annual "Bridge the Economic Gap" day. We will mount our nation's bridges and on Labor Day plus 1 (Sept 6th), we will fly our "Bridge the Economic Gap by paying a www.Universal Living Wage.org" signs.

E-mail Richard at rrtroxell@universallivingwage.com to discuss details about securing your banners with your logo on them. Be sure to put Universal Living Wage in the subject line.

January 12, 2005

Do People receiving tips need to be paid a living wage?

Yes, they do. Check out our new entry under Facts and Myths to find out why.

10 Year Plan to End Homelessness

"In communities all across America, local activists and governments are participating with the federal government in a historic initiative to end 'chronic homelessness.' To this end, we are devising local ten year plans to accomplish this task, but just as there is a myriad of local concerns that we must bring to focus, there are also external factors at the national level affecting our communities that must be addressed if we are to be successful in this herculean expenditure of time, money, and energy."
To read more of this important announcement from the ULW Campaign, please visit this page.

June 22, 2004

Costco makes money and pays a living wage

A new article by Jim Hightower shows once again that paying a living wage isn't altruistic, it's good business sense. Click here to read more.

May 10, 2004

Greens Join Labor, Justice Groups in Campaign for "Living Wage"

By DEAN MYERSON, ASGP Staff

An honest day's pay for an honest day's work - that's the concept. And most people believe that honest pay means that someone who works a full-time job should be able to afford the basic necessities of life - including food and a roof over one's head and their family.

But in a United States where economic policy is written for the benefit of the few and the disparity of income and wealth has reached levels not seen in many, many decades, we have the reality of the working poor - people who toil hard hours in tough jobs but who still must decide between paying rent or buying food. The minimum wage - in existence since the Depression - is supposed to prevent this. But its level has been declining in real, inflation-adjusted, dollars since the 1960's, and today is far below the poverty rate. (Click here to read more.)


April 16, 2004

US Military Indexes Wages to the Local Cost of Housing!

The headline says it all--the US government uses the Base Allowance for Housing (BAH) "to provide uniformed service members accurate and equitable housing compensation based on housing costs in local civilian housing markets, and is payable when government quarters are not provided." How do they determine the BAH? It's based on geographic duty location, pay grade, and dependency status.

Beginning January 1, 1998, the Defense Finance and Accounting System introduced BAH to replace the Variable Housing Allowance (VHA) and Basic Allowance for Quarters (BAQ) programs because "the old VHA/BAQ housing allowance system was unable to keep up with housing costs, and members were being forced to pay larger out-of-pocket costs than originally intended. With BAH, increases are indexed to housing cost growth instead of the pay raise, thus protecting members from any further erosion of housing benefits over time."

The BAH is calculated by "computing ... local price data of rentals, average utilities and insurance". Sound familiar?

The Secretary of Defense determines "the cost of adequate housing in a Military Housing Area (AHA)". The above information came from the Department of Defense Website and the Defense Finance and Accounting System Website. Below are their links respectively:

http://www.dod.mil/comptroller/fmr/07a/07A26.pdf

http://www.dtic.mil/perdiem/bahintro.html



We have a new white paper in .pdf format!
Globilization and Labor.

Adobe® Reader® is a free product. If you do not have this software, please click on the thumbnail below to download the program.

Get Adobe Reader



ULW Tax Day Rally in Austin, TX!

Help us continue the national campaign to fix the Federal minimum wage! Join us Thursday, April 15th, 2004— TAX DAY—when we pass out flyers, hold banners and wave signs!
Where: Austin, TX Main Post Office, 8225 Cross Park Drive or YOUR Main Post Office, in YOUR city and state.
Date/Time: Thursday, April 15th, 2004 from 9:30 pm-10:30 pm
Why: The Moral Premise that anyone working a 40 hour week should be able to afford basic rental housing.
What's the Tax Day Connection?
If all employers paid a Universal Living Wage to their minimum wage workers, the need for tax subsidies such as food stamps would be greatly reduced. For example: We found that the University of Texas (one of the largest and wealthiest universities in the world) paid their support staff so little that 230 of them were being subsidized by you and me with our taxes. They had to receive food stamps! They had to subsidize their salaries just so they could eat adequately. We believe that it is a moral issue that anyone who works a forty hour week should be paid enough to afford basic rental housing and enough to eat.
Join over 1,000 organizations Nationwide!
Every Tax Day we ask the recipients of our campaign kits to go to their main post office on tax night, take a few people, a couple of red and white yard signs and the banner and help make a statement about taxes and wages:
"If all businesses paid a Universal Living Wage, we could reduce the tax burden on every single American!"
Put out a simple press release that you'll be there and then go! Get 15 minutes of fame and you're done. Take a few pictures and send them to us. We'll get them up on the web site!

We've sent out 88 ULW Campaign Kits--we hope to receive 88 different Tax Day pictures!




January 15, 2004

Henry Ford thought of it first...A Living Wage makes sense.

The Universal Living Wage Campaign has released a short white paper on the ULW effects on business and taxpayers.
Henry Ford, the father of the automobile, was facing exorbitant retraining costs due to high employee turnover. He was being forced to replace every employee 4 times per year. He also found that absenteeism was at an equally unacceptable level. His response was to almost double the daily wage of his base workers to $5.00/hour.

The immediate result was:
  1. significant reduction in employee turnover
  2. significant reduction in retraining costs
  3. significant reduction in unscheduled absenteeism
  4. and almost complete stoppage of internal theft (roughly 50% of the theft in the retail world is committed by its own employees).1
Furthermore, he created a true economic stimulus resulting in a business boom for his own company when his workers put discretionary funds right back into his company as purchasing consumers.
*All of these savings/benefits are possible today with the enactment of the Universal Living Wage.
To read more, go to our new white paper,
ULW Effect on Business and Taxpayers.

Adobe® Reader® is a free product. If you do not have this software, please click on the thumbnail below to download the program.

Get Adobe Reader


December 12, 2003

Endorsement # 1,000!

Global Exchange has become the 1000th organization to endorse the Universal Living Wage Campaign!
We launched our campaign on April 15, 2001. Using existing government guidelines, we devised a single national formula designed to fix the Federal Minimum Wage.
Among our most recent endorsers are: C Van R Automotive, Students for a New Democracy, STAND, United for a Fair Economy, The Labor Council for Latin American Advancement- (a national endorsement), and the Oklahoma Federation of Teachers Local 2309 AFT.
All of our endorsers share the belief that anyone working a 40 hour week should at least be able to afford basic housing wherever that work is done throughout the US.
We now have supporting groups and businesses in every state...three times over. Our next immediate goal is to muster four then five such organizations in each state and then coordinate our efforts. We continue to build our base and get the word out. We have sample letters, editorials, signs, bumper stickers, etc. in our campaign kit. E-mail us for a kit and watch the What's New button on our website at www.UniversalLivingWage.org. Please stay engaged. Please encourage another group to endorse the campaign.
Together, we can turn this ship.
Richard R. Troxell
ps- Remember to always notify us if your e-mail address changes. Thanks.

November 24, 2003

What our Representatives in Congress are saying......

" The Campaign for a Living Wage is fundamental to making certain that people have more than crumbs when they sit down to eat their daily bread." —Dennis Kucinich, (D-OH, 10th District)

"If there is going to be a minimum wage – and there are strong free-market arguments against it – than having a variable minimum wage tied to the local cost of housing could be fairer than the current system. In some future year, Labor Day might include the celebration of a new kind of minimum wage."
Lamar Smith (R-TX, 21st District)


October 27, 2003

We've Been Fighting for One Hundred Years...

One hundred years ago, in 1903, women from all over America fought for the same basic life ten